<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember the Ammo Dump Explosions with no Casulties?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Czech Air</title>
		<link>http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>Czech Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>The main problem I see with the sources reporting 300 dead are that they originate from the same source. See what I am saying? The source everyone is pointing to has some pretty ugly ties to anti-war propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem I see with the sources reporting 300 dead are that they originate from the same source. See what I am saying? The source everyone is pointing to has some pretty ugly ties to anti-war propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/comment-page-1/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>OK I like that logic.  So the non US news stories are all made up...  It's possible and I think it's even likely.  It is strange.  In conclusion:  Upon further investigation and input from Chaz (as the voice of reason) I retract this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I like that logic.  So the non US news stories are all made up&#8230;  It&#8217;s possible and I think it&#8217;s even likely.  It is strange.  In conclusion:  Upon further investigation and input from Chaz (as the voice of reason) I retract this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Czech Air</title>
		<link>http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/comment-page-1/#comment-2751</link>
		<dc:creator>Czech Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/#comment-2751</guid>
		<description>I was being sincere. The munitions stores are spread out and there are berms to deflect explosions away from ground positions. Plus, modern weaponry is designed  not to explode in situations like this. 

Think about it, you have 1,000-pound bombs, right. And you also have the fuses for those 1,000-pound bombs. The bombs are not fused until they are going to be used, so in essence they are duds. 

Also, I would think that modern weaponry has advanced from the days of the volatile black powder. So there would be more burning and less exploding.

Again, this is just my assumptions. I just am having a hard time believing the sources people have been putting out there and have even a harder time believing that someone in the mainstream media hasn't sniffed out this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was being sincere. The munitions stores are spread out and there are berms to deflect explosions away from ground positions. Plus, modern weaponry is designed  not to explode in situations like this. </p>
<p>Think about it, you have 1,000-pound bombs, right. And you also have the fuses for those 1,000-pound bombs. The bombs are not fused until they are going to be used, so in essence they are duds. </p>
<p>Also, I would think that modern weaponry has advanced from the days of the volatile black powder. So there would be more burning and less exploding.</p>
<p>Again, this is just my assumptions. I just am having a hard time believing the sources people have been putting out there and have even a harder time believing that someone in the mainstream media hasn&#8217;t sniffed out this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Czech Air</title>
		<link>http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/comment-page-1/#comment-2750</link>
		<dc:creator>Czech Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/#comment-2750</guid>
		<description>After looking at bongo's link to the photos, I am going to have to say I believe the no casualties and deaths claim. The way the base looks laid out, it should be able to withstand an attack and not have any deaths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking at bongo&#8217;s link to the photos, I am going to have to say I believe the no casualties and deaths claim. The way the base looks laid out, it should be able to withstand an attack and not have any deaths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bongo</title>
		<link>http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/comment-page-1/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>bongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eightandfive.com/2006/10/29/remember-the-ammo-dump-explosions-with-no-casulties/#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2006/10/23/2113841-ap.html

http://www.rense.com/general73/falcphotos.htm

It seems you get better results for FOB Falcon if you use a search engine that is not in the United States.  Google is nearly scrubbed clean of all US-based references to FOB Falcon.  The only ones Googling through seem to be off-shore websites which I would expect will be removed from search results eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2006/10/23/2113841-ap.html" rel="nofollow" class="">http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2006/10/23/2113841-ap.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general73/falcphotos.htm" rel="nofollow" class="">http://www.rense.com/general73/falcphotos.htm</a></p>
<p>It seems you get better results for FOB Falcon if you use a search engine that is not in the United States.  Google is nearly scrubbed clean of all US-based references to FOB Falcon.  The only ones Googling through seem to be off-shore websites which I would expect will be removed from search results eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
